''Does Retaliation really generate another round of Terrorism'' What about total eradication.

Try tuning to CNN during the early hours of the morning, and you gonna get violence, violence, and even more violence. I know most of you are familiar with this statement. I ask a quick question, Do you think violence can be moderated with curtailing it with more violence....Lets go down memory lane.

The first war against terrorism was carried out halfway I must say. Quaddafi as we all know never abandoned terrorism and in his next life, he's gonna pick up arms again. After he took over power in 1969, he made a decree that Libyan flag should be changed to solid, unadorned green, a statement that no regime could be more Islamic than his. He confessed openly that he was locked in a religious conflict with the West and no one else. The air strikes made by President Reagan against Quadaffi was considered successful but turned out to be an unsustained gesture. All hits against him and his group by Americans only made them lower their profile and plan strategically. If you can remember the destruction in 1989 of PAN AM flight103 over scotland by a bomb planted on board. What had the US forgotten to learn....What has the world forgotten to learn. Retaliation only generates another round of terrorism; what do you think may be the solution? Has the world thought about complete eradication as the only way out. Think about it. Do you think all the battles that have been carried out against terrorism by the US and the world is focused on the lowest suspects and the masterminds in Isolation of it all.